Yeah, I have anecdotal evidence Isenburg gave the OK (Hobu noted it on the liblas list), but he didn't specify exactly for *what* he was okay with from the tools collection which makes me nervous. If he were to say "all of it", then we're all set (I just care about the TINner inside lasview).
Sometimes it's a pain when you try to play by the rules :-( -mpg -----Original Message----- From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:55 PM To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Open source TIN code? Traian Stanev wrote: > It's probably worth sending an email to Isenburg to ask for the > actual licensing restrictions of his stuff. It was developed under an > NSF grant, so he may not have much choice but to allow it to be used > in a BSD-like way. We have already walked  that way in libLAS and it wasn't easy, a little roller coaster.  http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/liblas-devel/2008-October/000355.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss