Just for clarity and background. We announced the project form on discuss and imported the results/submissions of that form. There hasn't been any process other than that up to now.
For the record, I'm very much in favor of a "big tent" approach. If a software had an OSI approved license and deals with geospatial data, I believe it should have "some" place on our site. This is the approach that FOSS4G takes and I believe it is very successful for that very reason. I think we can pretty easily establish a set of criteria that can be used to make this determination. Whatever approach we take, we should be very clear what the criteria are. Glad to be having this discussion. Jeff On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:43 Massimiliano Cannata < massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote: > And istSOS :-) > > Il 18 ago 2017 5:25 PM, "Sandro Santilli" <s...@kbt.io> ha scritto: > >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: >> >> > Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects? >> >> This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is >> against GPL-licensed projects (like GRASS, QGIS, PostGIS) >> >> --strk; >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
