Dear Maria, I hope you can extend your advice also to Helmut.
Kind regards, Marc Vloemans > Op 18 aug. 2017 om 20:26 heeft Maria Antonia Brovelli > <maria.brove...@polimi.it> het volgende geschreven: > > Dear Ian > Please I kindly ask you to moderate your tone. I know that you have been > doing a lot and all of us we warmly thank you. But please consider that also > many other people have been putting a lot of energies in OSGeo. Helmut is one > of these people. > Probably you don't know him but this is just because the community is large > and there are people committed on different projects. > Thanks a lot for helping having a discussion frank and, at the the time, > kind. > Cheers > Maria > > > > > > Sent from my Samsung device > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Ian Turton <ijtur...@gmail.com> > Date: 18/08/2017 15:46 (GMT-05:00) > To: Jeffrey Johnson <ortel...@gmail.com> > Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, Helmut Kudrnovsky > <hel...@web.de> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Note the LocationTech badge is not showing > correctly > > When we met up in Chicago to set up OSGEO the desire was to be as inclusive > as possible. I donate alot of time to OSGEO when I could be doing something > fun like coding and I'm getting fed up with charter members popping up on the > mailing lists and complaining about stuff that they haven't done anything > about. > > I want people to come to the OSGEO website to find out about any and all open > source spatial software, if this worries you then please work to make your > software better rather than trying to avoid the competition or go and set up > another website that matches your dreams of how the world should be. > > Ian > > On 18 Aug 2017 14:47, "Jeffrey Johnson" <ortel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just for clarity and background. We announced the project form on discuss and > imported the results/submissions of that form. There hasn't been any process > other than that up to now. > > For the record, I'm very much in favor of a "big tent" approach. If a > software had an OSI approved license and deals with geospatial data, I > believe it should have "some" place on our site. This is the approach that > FOSS4G takes and I believe it is very successful for that very reason. > > I think we can pretty easily establish a set of criteria that can be used to > make this determination. Whatever approach we take, we should be very clear > what the criteria are. > > Glad to be having this discussion. > > Jeff > >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:43 Massimiliano Cannata >> <massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote: >> And istSOS :-) >> >> Il 18 ago 2017 5:25 PM, "Sandro Santilli" <s...@kbt.io> ha scritto: >>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:19:52PM +0200, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: >>> >>> > Will locationtech also promote OSGeo projects? >>> >>> This is an interesting question, especially as LocationTech is >>> against GPL-licensed projects (like GRASS, QGIS, PostGIS) >>> >>> --strk; >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
