-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't think we can get a full-on liquor license at all, since we won't have a bartender or server who can look after things. It'd be worth talking to the MLCC, though, any volunteers?
I think we can, however, get a license for certain events, and those events can be declared 18+ if that's necessary (I'm not sure if it is.. are socials 18+?) In terms of making the exception, I think this is just evidence that the rule is unnecessary. If there's one cool 18- person, there are probably more. We'll still do everything on a case-by-case basis, but without the age restriction. Ron On 2012-11-07 09:20, Courtney Lofchick wrote: > I have no problem with this, however I was under the impression we were > going to try to get a liquor license in our new place. Will having minors > as members interfere with this? > If so, this guy is turning 18 in a few months why don't we just vote > to make an exception rather than opening the door to all teenagers. > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Cool, we seem to have support! Let's put this on the ballot for the last > > meeting in November! > > > > Ron > > > > On 2012-11-07 00:48, Ron wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > We had a guy show up to the meeting today who's interested in joining, > > > but he won't be 18 till March. Our original reasoning for disallowing > > > minors was in part due to the danger of the workshop tools, many of > > > which aren't coming over with the move. > > > > > > So, because I like arguing, I thought I'd re-open the discussion. > > > > > > How do people feel about changing the rule to 16+, parent's signature, > > > and, as always, people have an opportunity to object if the perrson > > > doesn't seem responsible. > > > > > > I realize that if two people are against this, then there's no sense in > > > discussing it since they could object to any <18 member who tries to > > > join. > > > > > > Ron > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > > > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAlCaBE8ACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/TCGgCghL5K26AKVfiHRgV0xMb3F5Gj > > > T8EAoJBgXSk8yZIrUnI/D4lqvYv0bRky > > > =IMLS > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAlCaedgACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/RTAwCeMSzP4QKxtk54VaXdGflexo5s > > wRAAoItgalZa0ze9dxDs3j21MATH+MlY > > =82a6 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCafhsACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/TK/ACgxjLzKA8SQxB/XNmHiQihh3FM /OgAniegRi9jPb4VHZ+MHIF7b6q5lWjC =Krhi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
