Yeah, but generally speaking, hackers don't follow other people's processes anyhow.
I suggest that the minutes be left on the wiki (for easier updates), and that the "secretary" update them and "lock" them after they are approvedat the next meeting. On Mar 11, 2014 12:59 PM, "Ron" <[email protected]> wrote: > > 3) Minutes really should be approved before posting them to our > archives. > > The quick posting through discuss is being done this way so people can > > review before approving at the meeting. > > The wiki/archives can be changed, if needed. I don't know how 'official' > people want to be, I've never really held with officialness, obviously > :) > > > 4) I am keeping the most recent version. That is why I am trying to > add > > the statement to contact me to add any changes. The moat recent > version > > really only needs to benin possession of the person chairing that > week's > > meeting. > > That kind of thing doesn't pass the "hit by a bus" test. > > > The wiki looks terrible, is outdated, and needs serious TLC. It is on > the > > boards list of things to do, but is much less pressing than a lot of > other > > tasks we are facing. > > Looks don't really matter, though we can theme it differently if that's > an actual problem. > > The software isn't seriously outdated, and I spend a lot of time keeping > the information up to date. It should be reasonably up to date. > > It definitely needs some serious TLC. :) > > > We have very few processes in place in the organization right now. We > need > > a bit of an overhaul and these are first steps. Yes it is rocky, and > the > > comments are appreciated! Hopefully next week all is fixed. > > Yeah, processes have always been a pain point for us. We have some > documented on the wiki, but nobody follows them (or knows about them). :) > > > > > --BP > > > > I agree the wiki is a probably the best place for our documents. > > Especially if they require collaboration. However, I would like to > see us > > going back to having the agenda and meeting minutes pasted into the > body > > of emails. > > Brian Kulyk > > 204.887.6988 > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey folks, > > > > There has been a lot of complaining on the lists lately about > document > > formats and such, so I thought I'd make a new thread for it. > > > > In the past week, me and Nathan updated the various wiki pages > related > > to the election. Me and Mak used to do this, but neither of us are > on > > the board now so I'd appreciate it if the current board could take > over > > responsibility for tracking our history on the wiki. It's our only > real > > historical record. > > > > More importantly, I've noticed Word docs going around lately. I > don't > > know where that came from, but unless we're also installing > Sharepoint > > or something similar, I think this is a bad, bad idea. Word offers > no > > way to collaborate, version, share, and link other than attaching to > > emails and arguing about who has the most recent version. > > > > Plus, using commercial products is very non-hackery. I'd even call > it > > mildly embarrassing. *MY* SkullSpace using .docx? OMGZ!? :) > > > > Anyway, I *highly* recommend using the wiki for this sort of thing. > If > > there's some reason we stopped using the wiki, then let's tackle > that (I > > can install new plugins or whatever if that's the issue) or let's > look > > for a different solution. If we need professional looking > documents, we > > can copy stuff from the wiki into a .docx when needed. > > > > Much to the chagrin of others, I brought up Google Docs in the other > > thread. Yes, it's the company I work for. I think the wiki is a much > > better solution, but Docs has the collaboration/sharing/etc that > Word > > lacks, and is also open to all (with a Google account). We also use > > Google Calendar, so if somebody is willing to take the time to set > > everything up, we can use the full ecosystem. But I still think the > Wiki > > is the way to go. > > > > So yeah, please use this thread to discuss this sorta thing. And if > you > > *do* decide that .docx is the most hackery format, then be prepared > for > > me to complain every time I see it on the list. :P > > Ron > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: > https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
