My SB2 turned up from MultiTask today :-D

Plain black wired.

On Apr 5, 2005 2:06 PM, Dan Goodinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've not seen SB2 in the UK yet, although in fairness I've not looked
> too hard as I'm happy enough with SB1 for the moment.
> 
> I've seen discussion of various issue/problems with the slimserver v6
> release, but don't be overly concerned.  From my own experience, I've
> had it running solidly for most of the weekend after a very recent
> upgrade (mainly streaming radio, but also a good few hours of MP3
> playback) and it seems fine.  I had a minor issue with DB corruption
> which was very easily fixed by upgrading to a new "nightly" build.  I
> know that a lot of people here would consider nightly builds to be beta
> - perhaps that is the case, although I see it as kind of an intermediate
> service pack (or a cumulative patch or something).  It's listed on the
> site as a maintenance release, so it doesn't worry me that much.
> 
> I can't speak about the SB2 hardware, as I've not seen/used one.  But
> I've not seen much on these lists regards hardware probs...  I would
> imagine that the most serious problem would be intermittent restart of
> the SB2 hardware.  Again, based on my own experience with SB1, I would
> say that the majority of reboots are caused by wi-fi interference, and
> therefore something that Slim Devices can't control.  If you experience
> anything like this, sort out interference first (e.g. reposition the
> device, or change channels, or get a directional antenna etc).  Can't
> comment on any of the other issues you refer to, though.
> 
> But bear in mind that Slim Devices seem to be a cool company :)  My
> perception is that they are "safe" - if you experience any problem, and
> find that you can't fix it then return the device for a refund.  If it
> were me, I wouldn't hold off getting an SB2 just because there may be
> some issues - but these are issues you may never encounter, so don't
> worry about it unless it happens.
> 
> The support here is pretty cool, so if you encounter a problem there's a
> good chance that it can be resolved through use of these lists.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
> Sent: 05 April 2005 13:12
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [slim] New SB2 owner is getting a bit worried
> 
> I'm completely new to the whole Squeezebox arena.  I learnt about SB a
> few weeks ago and now have a SB2 on order in the UK from
> multitaskcomputing.co.uk.  In the meantime, I've put together a
> Debian/testing box with a large hard disk and have started ripping my
> entire cd collection to FLAC using EAC.  I'm running SlimServer 6.01 on
> the server and am using SoftSqueeze on my pc.  I've no idea when my SB2
> will arrive so, to steady my impatience, have started reading this
> forum.  I've therefore started reading all sorts of comments saying bad
> things about SlimServer 6.0, and have also found comments saying that
> SB2 will likely have hardware issues that will be resolved (in the
> hardware, not the firmware) in future versions.  It seems that I've
> basically bought a beta-release hardware product which I'll be running
> with a beta-release server.  Obviously, this worries me quite a lot! Are
> these things really true?  Should I cancel my SB2 order immediately and
> wait 6 months (or buy something else)?  I'm obviously hoping that this
> isn't the case.  Please reassure a new member of the flock!
> 
> As an aside, does anyone know what the situation with buying an SB2 in
> the UK is?  They seem to be in rather short supply!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Max Spicer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to