Skunk wrote:
peter;356187 Wrote:
Ah, a binary. I just installed it I'm not very impressed. Imitation of
hardware devices doesn't seem to be the way to a good desktop
experience.
I hope this isn't in defense of Softsqueeze being a good desktop
experience, considering it's even more of an 'imitation of hardware
devices'. What would have impressed you?
I don't like SoftSqueeze either as a user experience. I'd like to have
an application with a computer user interface. Fast and sleek end making
good use of the PC's mouse and keyboard. A PC/OS/X/Linux desktop
application and not a web interface or Controller imitation. Something
I'd like to use when I'm sitting behind my PC.
peter;356187 Wrote:
A PC is not a controller
Sure it is, or did you mean Controller?
In Dutch we call this comma-fucking ;).
Anyway, I mainly just came back to re-post this photo Ben put in the
Beta forum- of Tom using his PC (or Mac or whatever) as a controller.
This feature has been asked for many times, IIRC, and would have never
been possible, or just looked pretty silly, using SoftSqueeze:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6124&stc=1&d=1225210677
That's nice, but it's not a PC application. It's a status screen. It
certainly has it's uses as I already wrote in another thread. My point
is and remains that controlling your SD-system from a PC has always been
clunky. And SqueezePlay isn't going to improve that very much. I bet
I'll keep using my browser instead. And perhaps put up a laptop with a
fullscreen SqueezePlay stuck at the Now Playing page when we have a party.
Regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
