A lot more arguments for using AIFF than WAV. You can do everything with AIFF that you can with FLAC and considerably more because it works with iTunes, which, of course, FLAC doesn't.
Apart from the space issue, which is probably going to be significant only for tracks used on an iPod (and it's easy to create ALAC versions specifically for that purpose) AIFF is better than ALAC for Squeeze Box use, because the FF and RW on SqueezeCenter also work, which they don't with ALAC. Geraint On 13 Apr 2009, at 20:10, funkstar wrote: > > But as both ALAC and wav are lossless, you can transcode to any other > lossless format without impacting quality. > > There aren't many reasons to use wav (and none of those are good > reasons), but there are stacks of reasons to use Flac.... and > lots , if > a few less, to use ALAC. > > > -- > funkstar > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php? > userid=2335 > View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62310 > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
