jmpage2;493980 Wrote: 
> I have actually been surprised myself that Logitech hasn't simply made
> an offer to buy the iPeng product line, rebadge them as Logitech branded
> applications and offer them for free to drive more sales of the hardware
> they make money on.
> 
> What would be the harm in them offering him $250K for his sweet sweet
> application if he also agrees to go on retainer to continue supporting
> it for the next few years?
> 
Once again, if they use these $250K to spend some resources to
encourage and offer better support for third party development I bet
they would be able to get a lot more third party add-ons besides just
the iPeng app.

I understand that some people seems to think that everything will be
better if it's owned by Logitech but I personally really don't think
this is the case. 

I believe Logitech would get more advantages of supporting third party
development than actually owning the third party development. One reason
that we have some very creative solutions made by third party developers
today is that they aren't restricted by the Logitech management and
strategy in the same way as all in-house development are. Third party
developers can create solutions that are a bit outside the box, while
all in-house development has to follow the main strategy.


-- 
erland

Erland Isaksson
'My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info) (Install my plugins through
Extension Downloader)
(Developer of 'TrackStat, SQLPlayList, DynamicPlayList, Custom Browse,
Custom Scan,  Custom Skip, Multi Library, Title Switcher and Database
Query plugins'
(http://wiki.erland.isaksson.info/index.php/Category:SlimServer))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72308

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to