Music Machine wrote:
Two cents from the Peanut Gallery
It seems like people are pretty happy with performance if they have
around 350 or less albums in the database. 750 albums or more is about
the place where no one seems satisfied with performance. Between those
quantities satisfaction varies quite a bit. I could easily have missed
posts to the contrary.
On the surface it looks like data handling is the bottleneck, not
processing power.
I have no problems running SS on w2k with a 800mhz PIII and only 256
meg ram. My database has a little less than 350 albums.
Regards,
Music Machine
728 albums with 8504 songs by 755 artists
My performance is still fine on 6.1.1, though there can be some slowness
in browsing music. I guess I'd better quit buying albums :)
--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
