Robin Bowes Wrote: > I'm not necessarily advocating writing our own scheduling code - that's > what the operating system is for! Absolutely. > If there is a need for 6 processes then why not have 6 operating system > processes? At least in the windows case, I'm sure there's a fair overhead to the windows perl support. I know, for instance, that the windows perl implementation creates a directory in temp with a bunch of run-time-compiled code with serialized names. How well this scheme scales is unclear to me. Anyone who has benchmarked it care to comment?
Michael -- Michaelwagner _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
