+1. Perfect summary.
On 20 Oct 2011, at 14:39, Phil Leigh wrote: > > > Just to be clear, I have no issue with Erland choosing to charge people > for his work going forward - that is his inalienable right. However, > nobody SHOULD provide anything - under licence or under contract - for > free or for a price - and then disable it or disable it until a fee is > paid... UNLESS it was spelled out at the time of supply (i.e. as a > Licence/contract term) that this could or would happen. > > I'm not saying anyone should or even could sue anyone - that's just > silly. I was talking about the general case of retrospective > modification of contract or license terms which is normally something > only Governments can do with impunity... !! > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
