cunobelinus;664491 Wrote: > +1. Perfect summary. > > > On 20 Oct 2011, at 14:39, Phil Leigh wrote: > > > > > > Just to be clear, I have no issue with Erland choosing to charge > people > > for his work going forward - that is his inalienable right. However, > > nobody SHOULD provide anything - under licence or under contract - > for > > free or for a price - and then disable it or disable it until a fee > is > > paid... UNLESS it was spelled out at the time of supply (i.e. as a > > Licence/contract term) that this could or would happen. > > > > I'm not saying anyone should or even could sue anyone - that's just > > silly. I was talking about the general case of retrospective > > modification of contract or license terms which is normally > something > > only Governments can do with impunity... !! > >
ok so legally there is a potential conflict, what are you going to do next? Your options look like 1) Legally take it further 2) Write your own version of the plugins which is legally correct and keep them free & fully in your control 3) use previous versions of plugins which are still free 4) Swallow the conflict and pay for the plugins Despite the legal issue I'm still sticking with 4) -- socistep ------------------------------------------------------------------------ socistep's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18860 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=90975 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
