Mnyb wrote: > *sigh* I really must rub those guys the wrong way , my latest comment is > still awaiting moderation ? > > why is this question a problem: > > " > Your comment is awaiting moderation. > > Thanks for clarifications . > > Can the rationale for ending the squeezebox system as we know it be > explained ? > > I can understand why you try this new UE system it has its applications > ( even if I dont believe its the rigth thing for this market ). > > But why does this exclude further development of the squeezebox line up > ? > They are not mutually exclusive and are not attractive to the same > customers ,but they share a common hardware and software platform ? > As I see it you could get 2 for 1 one here . > > There is really no other options ( yet ) for a typical squeezebox power > user ,you had this niche for yourself ,no competition at all and I still > thinks you missed the majority of possible customers due to > mismanagement of the product historically .but the potential is still > there. > > *"
Just to reiterate a point, the number of users who interact here on the Squeezebox forums is about 0.01% - 0.001% of the actual, live, connected-to-mysqueezebox.com population. Even that population is only a percentage of all Squeezebox out there -- there are many users who simply use LMS locally and never connect. If you want your voice to be heard, you have to be persistent and attack with all avenues at your disposal. The blog is only one such avenue. You can imagine for the people who are not reading these forums, that they are generally unaware of the issues that you have with the new strategy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ routehero's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=54579 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96606
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
