JJZolx wrote: > I'm not positive, but I believe that it does increase both the work done > by the server when pre-caching resized artwork during a scan, plus the > amount of storage required for the cached images. >
It doesn't increase storage size - the size of the cached image is the same, no matter what the source. > > Like I say, I'm not 100% certain, but it would take some effort to tell > if images embedded in different files are the same, and it would have > had to have been done specifically to decrease the cache size and/or the > work done. It doesn't take additional effort for this, as LMS has to check each file for artwork in any case, since it's possible to have different artwork for tracks from the same album. The comparison if it's the same image is done using the path and the embedded art length, and both are known at this point of the processing. [ extGUI4LMS - an alternative web interface: 'forum' (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?98186-Announce-Alternative-Web-Interface-(beta)) / 'homepage' (http://code.google.com/p/extgui4lms/) ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roland0's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56808 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98996 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
![Re: [slim] Embed art vs folder.jpg?](/search?l=discuss@lists.slimdevices.com&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5Bslim%5C%5D+Embed+art+vs+folder.jpg%5C%3F%22&o=newest){kind=link}
