Owen Smith wrote: > According to sampling theory, you'd need a dog or a bat's hearing to > hear the difference between 96 and 192KHz sampling rate since only > frequencies above 48KHz benefit from greater than 96KHz sampling. 48KHz > is already more than twice what humans with the best hearing can hear, > why would we need more than that? And if you don't agree with sampling > theory, that's a problem because it's development lead to digital audio > (and not the other way round).
I agree with you totally on the practicality but just trying to answer questions people ask. Why are 192KHz DAC made in the first place ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104383 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
