utgg wrote: > Damn useful spin-off (together with 192KHz ADCs) for other applications > that need to record and play back high dynamic range signals at somewhat > higher than human audible frequencies though.
What is the correlation, in your view, between dynamic range and sample rate? As to high frequencies, even a 96 kHz sample rate is total overkill, allowing you to record signals up to 48 kHz, enough for the pet bat named Eric. :) "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104383 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
