pablolie wrote: 
> This probably has been discussed before, but I just wonder why I should
> be interested in MQA encoding for the music library I already have in my
> home environment. 
It will have no effect on your present library, as non of those files
are MQA encoded. So you should not be interested :D

pablolie wrote: 
> I see no bottlenecks to get even my 24/192 content (which I have, even
> though its merits in a home environment are a tad questionable to begin
> with, but that's another discussion altogether :D ) to any device in my
> home. Even with lowly, old 802.11g wireless (which the SB ecosystem
> supports), and even less so with 802.11ac which gets you a few Gbit/s
> across the house. So thank you very much, at home FLAC or whatever I
> already have works well enough.
Again you are 100% correct. 

pablolie wrote: 
> Which makes me think the sweet market spot for MQA is HiRez music
> streaming, since MQAs big virtue is it can pack a 24/192 stream 
> (~9Mbit/s) into the equivalent of a 16/44 stream (good ole 1.4Mbit/s).
> Which is relevant if (a) your bandwidth connection is less than
> ~12Mbit/s and (b) you still insist on listening to music in HiRez
> wherever you are. 
Again you are 100% correct, but read my last comment b.
Actually when I first read about MQA, I did not expect download MQA
files as an option. 

pablolie wrote: 
> Well, I don't, I am perfectly fine with Spotify-like streaming when I am
> not at home in front of the music shrine - but that's just me.
Actually I ask myself as well if hi res streaming has any value when you
are only using your phone and headset. As I think you need quite good
equiment to benefit from this. However my Tidal Hi-Fi subscription
sounds very well from my iPhone, and since I can download CD quality, I
can even bring the files with me and play on a plane. Or in the car. Or
just use Airplay / Chromcast. 

pablolie wrote: 
> So the question is - does the SB ecosystem even benefit from MQA?

Yes, if:
a: You are a Tidal Hi-Fi subscriber and has a Squeezebox Touch, and
probably other SB products, but I'm thinking 24/96 is needed as minimum.
Tidal is the only subscription available in CD quality on SB platform,
and said to support MQA. If other will come, those should be included. 
b: Download (expensive) MQA fils, and use SBT / SB-products. Look at 2L
or 7Digital store to get a price idea.

Also it's said that even non MQA equipment will benefint from a MQA
stream / file. (So Tidal Hi-Fi subscribers get a free ride:cool:)

No, if
Your DAC is MQA enabled.

I do not know enough about Squeeze Lite as a possible option.

Assuming MQA is as fantastic as those few who have heard say it is, I
still think you need good equipment in order to benefit fully from MQA,
but I may be wrong. But that apply to hi-res as well...
Also any stremer or sw player will have a standard DAC profile, so in
order to have the very best, you will probably look for a MQA enabled
DAC. I predic there will be a lot of discussions at a later stage if you
really need that last DAC specific parameter, as long as your SW player
or streamer support MQA.

I wonder if Chromcast Audio will support MQA :D Tidal will support CA.
(Airplay does not support HRA)

*(HRA = High Res Audio)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
R1200CL's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=63832
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102648

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to