Mnyb wrote: > Yes about the 24/192 we have to have a positive outlook sometimes , are > that many studios still stuck in 24/48 ? 24/96 is all ok probably the > rigth compromise . > Having been in some actual studios , it differs :) maybe the ADC is not > the bottleneck but something else . It can be a mashup of disparate > equipment and everyone can not buy the new toys all the time.
Often the limiting factor is the software and digital audio processing computer - 48 vs 96 makes a big difference once you start stacking lots of channels. > Btw for download files why not 16/48 ? It would suit computers much > better and be easier to downsample to from the source. Downsampling is downsampling, the ratio doesn't really matter. But ironically mp3s are increasingly starting to be 48... :) > I do have the odd 24/48 recording too it may reflect the actual studio > master ... It means they are actually being honest! :) "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102648 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
