radish Wrote: > I just wanted to comment on this. There is certainly no obligation on > any customer to fix a problem, and likewise there's nothing saying you > can't request a change/fix - that's what bugs.slimdevices.com is for. > However, fixes via the "official" channels can take time, as issues > have to be prioritized vs limited resources. All kdf was saying is that > if this issue is such a problem for you, and it's not being resolved as > quickly as you desire, there is the option of fixing it yourself. Your > other option is simply to wait. With most software products, you only > have the second option.
at some poiunt, did i say anything to give you the impression that i thought any differently from anything you just wrote? i don't recall demanding anything now, i merely made my case that something was inadequite... and it was the resistence to that fact, in the various forms of the replies, which baffles me. you go on (as others have) to admit that i am in fact, right, the explanation should be better and stated. but then u turnaround and act as if i've done something wrong to point this out. i don't get it. the problem for me was fixed when kdf imparted the knowledge to me. SS should have done that in their explanation. all i have done here, is said in no uncertain terms, i think SD made a bad oversight which imo is glaring, insofar as it relates to the worth of this function, one they INTEND users to use if they so choose. its not about rushing to fix it, its not about how many people use it, its not about the marketplace or requesting new functions or changes to the design or anything else. its about FIXING a BONER. simple as that. i don't consider myself a heretic to say SD pulled one, and should fix it. radish Wrote: > While I agree that the extra verbage probably should be there, probably? as opposed to what... not being there? this couldn't be more clear cut. why waver? radish Wrote: > I disagree that it's ommission is "huge, glaring and ridiculous". It's > actually pretty small, subtle and trivial. It's not in 6.3, and there's > nothing that can be done about that - but if someone raises a bug ticket > it may be included into a future version of the 6.3.x branch. Of course > if 6.5 comes along quickly we may not need it. its huge, glaring, and ridiculous IF you want to make use of the function. in that context, its huge. i agree in the overall picture, its not such a big deal, i never said it was. i was speaking within the context of the utility of this fucntion, and i stand by what i said. -- MrSinatra www.LION-Radio.org Using: Squeezebox2 w/SS 6.3 - Win XP Pro SP2 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25387 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
