Siduhe Wrote: > This made me laugh out loud. And not in a bad way, or in anyway trying > to denigrate the contribution that Mr Sinatra is making. But I think > it hits the nail on the head. > > It's impossible to come up with a product that is infinitely variable > and configurable to meet individual likes and dislikes, whilst keeping > it simple and accessible to the average user. > > Personally, I think Slim do a pretty good job of "out of the box" for > the average user (though arguably not as good as Sonos or Roku) but > with plenty of configurability for the people who want to go further. > But then I would think that - I'm one of the people who want to go a > bit further. > > What I find difficult is to know how to respond to someone who has a > query which can be resolved, but the resolution requires some > modification of their setup, which they aren't willing to do. > > "But I don't want to do that" is a perfectly valid response, but it > seems to me that the answer is then "fine, file a bug and see if you > can get enough people who feel the same way to vote for it and bring it > to the attention of the development team".
just to be clear, i don't even know if what i'm saying qualifies as a bug. i just think a line saying "one must 'clear and scan' their library after updating this option" is necessary. kdf seems to disagree. and i can't fathom that for the life of me. but, regardless i appreciate the help i get. -- MrSinatra www.LION-Radio.org Using: Squeezebox2 w/SS 6.3 - Win XP Pro SP2 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25387 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
