I echo similar concerns. While it looks very slick, the multiple buttons and screen dominating the front makes this look less serious than a typical high end device.
Coming from the Naim school of thought...... CardinalFang Wrote: > Me too, but I think those displays are a mistake. Many audiophiles > dislike anything other than audio amplification consuming power. I > never have visualisations on and I turn off the display a lot of the > time simply because they are distracting. When this thing gets a > serious review, there will be comments about the sound with the > displays on and off. I would have preferred to see no display or a > small one and a much better remote with a display, it's more practical, > if a little harder to accomplish from the SB3 starting point. > > I have to say, I'm not keen on the design, it's too fussy with loads of > buttons that will never get used. I have Copland gear that is clean > looking and functional and I wish it had been more like that. Overall > though I applaud Slim for the product - it's what the market needs and > a good move. I hope the server software is vastly improved too. > > Paul -- agentsmith ------------------------------------------------------------------------ agentsmith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1838 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25771 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
