CardinalFang Wrote: > it isn't in the same box as the audio components and therefore > potentially affecting audio quality. You can argue whether it does or > not, but if there was no display in the transporter and instead it was > on a remote, then it definitely wouldn't be degrading audio.
I think they've probably gone out of their way to ensure that there is no noise from the display CardinalFang Wrote: > If you think you can hear that sort of difference in jitter, then > congratulations. It's a lot lower than most highly regarded kit out > there and I suspect only a handful of people could reliably detect it. > I have no idea what the Sonos jitter is, but I am a Slim customer right > now - I have a modded SB2 feeding a Musical Fidelity DAC. Erm, that was my point. There's no way anyone on earth could hear that jitter. I was suggesting therefore that there wasn't possibly going to be any better digital output to any DAC from the Sonos' digital out. But since this was not your reason for prefering a Sonos / High-end DAC combo, more the asthetics / graphic remote, then I guess it's moot. Since all the circuitry is in effect there in the transporter to achieve the device that you want, and I would imagine exceed performance expectations, I would be surprised if Slim didn't bring an in-between device out that would fit the bill. Surely it would just be a case of 'stripping-out' the bits that you don't need. -- rickwookie ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rickwookie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6397 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25771 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
