I think there are basically two types of people:

Category 1: People that already have a 24/7 running server in their
home or easily can setup one.
- Often "geeks" or techincally savvy people
- I suspect most of the current SB owners are in this category

Category 2: People that don't have a 24/7 running server in their
home.
- Non techincally savvy people
- Mass market
- I suspect most of the future SB owners will be in this category

Category 1 can see all the advantages with a slim device, for category
2 it doesn't matter as much. For category 2 a slim device really just
adds complexity since you need 2 boxes to control. IMO Logitech needs
to make the category 2 people happy since this is where the market
growth is.

Now, the main issues with making the SB a fat device as I see it is:
1. 
It would require huge development costs, we are basically talking about
rewriting SlimServer for other hardware in another language. Years of
development has been invested in the current SlimServer software,
besides the gained experience all this invested time would be lost.
During the time the development of the new fat device the competitors
already in this area would just add more functionality to their
product. When Logitech were finished with the fat device I expect the
competition to have even greater products. The current advantage
Logitech has over their competitors would be lost.

2.
A fat device would not be compatible with the current SB/Transporter
models regarding player synchronization. The result is that the current
customers would need to by completely new equipment.

3.
All the time invested in plugin development for the current SlimServer
would also be lost since all the plugins would have to be rewritten.
I'm not even sure Logitech would allow custom plugins on a fat device.

4.
The open source community around SlimServer would probably die. If you
look at most open source development today, it is almost always related
to something that can run on several software or hardware platforms.
Many open source developers are interested because they can make their
own custom solution with the hardware they currently own. Making a fat
device and hoping that the open source community would help developing
software that only would work on Logitech hardware is in my opinion
hoping for a bit too much. So, Logitech would probably have to do all
the work themselves.

===
Now, saying all this, there is a solution to this problem which I also
mentioned in my previous post.
- Leave the SB as a thin device
- Sell a hardware solution with pre-installed, pre-configured
SlimServer.

This way the users in catetory 1 can just buy the SB and use their
already existing 24/7 server for SlimServer. The users in category 2
could buy the complete package with both SB and SlimServer hardware.
The SlimServer hardware solution can be nicely designed so it can be
docked with the SB, making it look like a single unit for those users
that want this.
I'm sure there are hardware companies available that would like to join
efforts with Logitech, so a third party company could make the
SlimServer hardware and Logitech could focus on the SB hardware and
SlimServer software. This way this solution wouldn't require huge
development cost for Logitech. I don't think we are talking about a NAS
box for the SlimServer hardware, instead I'm think about something VIA
EPIA, Mac Mini or something similar. Basically a slower computer that
is small, silent and less power hungry than a normal computer.


-- 
erland

Erland Isaksson
'My homepage' (http://erland.homeip.net) 'My download page'
(http://erland.homeip.net/download)
(Developer of 'TrackStat, SQLPlayList, DynamicPlayList, Custom Browse,
Custom Scan,  Custom Skip, Multi Library and RandomPlayList plugins'
(http://wiki.erland.homeip.net/index.php/Category:SlimServer))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=37279

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to