seanadams;257401 Wrote: 
> Such as which one? 
> 
> The DAC1 is an excellent DAC but it does NOT beat Transporter on specs.
> Also, it uses ASRC, which as expected makes for OK measurements but is
> not universally believed to be without disadvantages in subjective
> sound quality.
> 
> Also, note that at this level of performance, you can't really look at
> two manufacturer's own specs side by side and expect a difference of
> one or two dB to tell you much. They have to be tested on the same
> equipment with the same cables etc, because these tests are going to be
> pushing the limits of the measuring equipment itself. Benchmark's
> published specs were done on AP, whereas our were done on the dScope.
> 
> If you are interested in how it stacks up against the DAC1 in
> particular, here is a test I did which deomnstrates Transporter's
> significantly lower jitter and noise floor. All products tested the
> same instrument:
> 
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28126
> 
> BetterDAC, your posts are quite ill-informed on the whole subject. You
> should read up further on our products, and on DAC characteristics in
> general, because your controversial viewpoints don't seem to be
> supported by anything at all!
Mr. Adams, It's a pleasure to get a response from the founder of Slim
Devices. Thank you. It's very impressive to see the founder of Slim
Devices as deeply involved in his company as you are. So it's easy to
see why you've been so successful with Slim Devices.

Having said that, I take exception to your assertion that my
"controversial viewpoints don't seem to be supported by anything at
all!" and that I am "ill-informed on the whole subject". 

I haven't written that many posts, but if you've read the few that I
have written I don't see how you could say they were unsupported or
ill-informed. Indeed several of them are very complimentary of your
products. And the post you're so thin-skinned about isn't ill-informed
at all. I’ve read a lot of the posts on the Slim Devices Forum and
there are some very bright people here, as well as some that truly are
“ill-informed”. I enjoy reading all of them. I suspect some of the
really bright guys might make some posts supporting my position and
challenging your assertions versus DAC1 or some of the other external
DAC options. But I’ll collect some public sources and web links and
respond to your challenge with information supporting my position. 

I would have thought that one of the benefits of establishing this
Forum was to get some feedback from your clients: some good, some bad,
some stupid, but perhaps a few really good ideas mixed in with all the
noise and banter that you might use for a future product? Or was it
established just so that you could read uncritical compliments?


-- 
BetterDAC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BetterDAC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14931
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to