JimC;290213 Wrote: 
> Here's the real problem: you think of this a simply an option, because
> on the surface that's the simple way to see it.  However, the
> reality--as everyone has tried to point out--is that this isn't a
> simple solution and handling it in the way you suggest may have all
> kinds of unintended consequences.  Tag handling is borked, mostly
> because of these types of "simple" workarounds that have created a mess
> of the intended use of the tags.

i totally get that.  please understand that its the GOAL i am arguing
for, i leave the implementation to brilliant coders like you and dean
and the rest of slim and the community.  i just want to communicate how
this lowly 'user' sees it.

JimC;290213 Wrote: 
> As I said in a separate message: we're gathering all the information we
> need to understand this issue and address it.  Once we're confident we
> have some idea of what's going on, we'll put together a proposal and
> let the community comment on it.  Once that's done, we'll be able to
> close on when/how it will be implemented.
> 
> No one is dismissing your request.  We're not guaranteeing it will be
> implemented exactly as you wish, but at least it's being considered. 
> Can we let it go at that--at least for now?
> 
> -=> Jim

you're a scholar and a gentleman.  thx.


-- 
MrSinatra

www.LION-Radio.org
Using:
Squeezebox2 (primary) / SBR (secondary) / Jive - w/SC 7.0.1beta - Win
XP Pro SP2 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - D-Link DIR-655
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46093

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to