pfarrell;291088 Wrote: 
> JJZolx wrote:
> >  If SqueezeCenter ever
> > gets to the point where clearing the database (which takes just a
> split
> > second) is undesirable or unnecessary then add a third scan option to
> do
> > a full scan without first clearing the database.
> 
> > > > Clearing the database is already undesirable. We just haven't gotten 
> > folks to accept that.> > 
> 
> No.  There's nothing in the database right now that can't be
> destroyed and rebuilt from scratch with a library scan.  At some
> point in the future maybe this will not be the case - such as for
> ratings.  But even with ratings, developers are (wisely) devising
> schemes that will survive a complete wipe of the database.
> 
> As to whether it's unnecessary... there are unfortunately still
> situations that require it.  Artwork problems immediately come to
> mind.  We still even have SD support telling people to uninstall,
> delete everything, and reinstall, to fix some problems.
> 
> > > > The database should be the repository of data, some from the tags, some
> > from other sources.> > 
> 
> That might be nice.  Like the plugin someone did to let you enter and
> manage sort strings for contributors that lives in a database outside
> of the tags.  No need then for things like ALBUMARTISTSORT,
> COMPOSERSORT, BANDSORT.
> 
> But when that day comes I'd imaging 'clearing' the database would
> then just selectively clear it.  Keep the data in the ratings table,
> for instance, but delete all tracks and albums.
> 
> > > > There is no possible way to handle the rich data needs of a complex 
> > library, especially for genres other than pop/rock/country with tags.
> > 
> > All of these many discussions/threads and confusion will go away when
> > we 
> > just stop thinking that the tags are the only source of data.
> > 
> > Its a relational database. It can do nearly anything. There is no hope
> > 
> > for a hierarchical tag based solution to do what we really need.> > 
> 
> Perhaps.  I certainly don't see any movement in the software, though,
> toward this end.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46093

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to