JJZolx;291115 Wrote: > > pfarrell;291088 Wrote: > > JJZolx wrote: > > No. There's nothing in the database right now that can't be destroyed > > and rebuilt from scratch with a library scan. > > > > > > You are correct that the current implementation relies on destroying > the database with every scan. > > This does not mean its a good idea. Its just the current idea. > > To support the proper handling of complex data structures requires a > change in the philosophy of the database. It requires that the > database not be treated glibly as ephemeral, but rather its the > source of all knowledge, some comes from the tags, some from other > sources. > > I proposed how to do this back in the 5.4 time frame, but the others > did not see the need. > > I believe that the need was there then, and is there now. > > Technically its not a major code change, but it takes a different > mind set.
-- pfarrell Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pfarrell's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=200 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46093 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
