I scanned this thread and decided it was really long enough without me adding to it. But, here I am anyway....
MrSinatra;313887 Wrote: > > its the rules that are the problem. the reason it is silly, is b/c it > assumes that any album with a single TPE1 mismatch is a VA / comp > album. that is ludicrous. You've made that statement several times in this thread. I assume the logic behind your statement is obvious to you, but it leaves me quite puzzled. Could you give some background please? What tags do you have? How did you get those tags? Why do those tags seem sensible to you? Why do you find the current logic ludicrous? The current behaviour seems quite logical to me. In views which are broken down first by artist then by album I can choose to have these albums (albums with tracks with different artists) listed multiple times (under each artist) or once (under the "Various Artists" umbrella). (The "guest artists" scenario described by Philip Meyer allows me to have it listed once, under the primary artist. Thats even better for those who can be bothered to set the funny tags.) I believe these are synonymous: 1. any album with a TPE1 mismatch 2. an album with tracks with different artists 3. an album with "various artists" -- htrd Toby Dickenson Search eBay for music matching your last.fm profile; www.exitahead.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ htrd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3710 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47297 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
