Thanks Adam,
It is a medical field so protection of rare case data is the stated
problem, some presenters worry that slides are copied then reused without
attribution. I strongly feel a blanket ban is an inappropriate response and
would prefer to see guidance that presentations are given under an
appropriate licence.
Enforcement is a different matter, that I don't think has been considered.
I suspect a blanket ban would be impossible to enforce anyway which is why
I suspect licencing is a better approach.
On Feb 26, 2016 5:33 PM, "Adam Obeng" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
>
> Do you have a little more background? Are you talking about recordings of
> presentations by third parties, by the organisers, or by the presenter? How
> would conferences implement a ban on recording? Why do presenters not want
> to allow photos of their slides? Is it a security or confidentiality thing,
> or something else?
>
> I am not a lawyer, but copyright law that applies by default would
> probably allow the reproduction of a photo of a slide, especially if it's
> for academic purposes. Creative Commons licenses are mostly designed to be
> *more* permissive than would otherwise be the case.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016, at 05:06 PM, Tom Wright wrote:
>
> Apologies for cross posting, looks like something is messed up with my SWC
> mailing list contacts.
>
>
> I thought I would post here to elicit experiences and thoughts.
>
> The scientific society that covers my field is having a discussion about
> recording rights for conference presentations. Some people have suggested a
> policy that bans recording all together. I'm not happy with this option and
> it has got me thinking about licencing options. I would like to see a
> policy that places presentations under a formal licence such as a Creative
> Commons licence.
> Does such a licence protect the presenter from derivative copies of work,
> such as a photo of a presentation slide?
> Do other scientific organisations have policies in this area?
>
> Thanks for your expertise,
> Tom
> *_______________________________________________*
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to