I've not used xlstat. I do use Excel frequently for quick and dirty things, and 
I understand it's limitations, and where it does things better than R/RStudio. 
[1] I'm also one of the local R champions/gurus.


Most of my research colleagues use Excel as that has been the easiest way for 
them to get at the results they want. It isn't big or clever to disrespect them 
or their competence. What we should be doing is demonstrating ways to go beyond 
what they can do, or to do it with more robustness, or to do it faster and 
repeatable, or usually a combination of all three. That doesn't mean putting 
Excel down. There are enough Gotcha's with R (students missing missing data and 
calculating across factors instead of numerical values for example, on a 
parallel with Excel's date handling train wreck).


We don't need to mock or put folk down. We just show them what we do, and 
explain why we do it, and help them learn how to do it that way. There is a 
learning curve and students will require some incentive to get over the 
'activation energy' and into a new way of working. Typically we enforce that at 
undergrad level by requiring they use R for reports and submit source code with 
it. This forces them to climb the cliff (as it were), and then realise how 
quick it is to perform exploratory analyses or plots once your data is in 
correctly.


If you want to compare Excel/R (for example) then maybe there should be a set 
of exercises that demonstrate the difference.


E.g. A data frame of three continuous variables x,y,z

Plot X against Y then put a ring around the top 10 values by z


We can get along without inflammatory zealotry. There are folk who have built 
robust and reproducible piplelines with Word and Excel. What we are teaching 
isn't so much software as a way of thinking.


[1] Adds fuel to the fire.. there are some but there aren't many.


Dr David Martin
Lecturer in Bioinformatics
College of Life Sciences
University of Dundee



________________________________
From: Discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Philip Rosenfield <[email protected]>
Sent: 05 May 2016 13:53
To: Bert Overduin
Cc: [email protected]; Dirk Eddelbuettel
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Word and PowerPoint "all wrong"?

I’ve been working with a professor who likes excel (+xlstat extension) for 
students learning to do statistical analysis because it allows them a quick 
feedback loop from their data to visualizing a result. It allows students to 
try different regressions etc, and see the differences, where command line 
stats packages separates that knowledge. In other words, could Excel be a good 
a sandbox for learning, and the question would become when and how to 
transition the students toward methods taught in SC/DC.

I’d be interested to hear the groups’ thoughts on that.

-Phil

On May 5, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Bert Overduin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I couldn't have said it better, Alistair!

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:59 PM, GRANT Alistair 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

>>It sounds like they were shunted into an R course they didn't care about.

If you read the comment, I don’t think this was the case, I think the
major point here is that the session (instructor/helper or material) gave
off an impression that they were an idiot for using Excel - This is not
conducive to a good learning environment - no matter an instructors
viewpoint they have to ensure students can learn. This is the impression I
have been getting from this whole thread of conversation - “If you don’t
do it a way I consider to be good or completely change how you work to
that way, you are an idiot” - especially in the use of evocative words
like “terrifies”. People have to exist in the real world and in many
places sudden change just isn’t possible so making small changes to move
towards a more efficient or “better” path is all they can do.

>>We should all take responsibility for the way we market our courses. If
>>someone is perfectly happy with Excel, then I might wonder what they're
>>doing in academia, but I wouldn't push them to do an R course.


I think that this statement is utterly out of order - one) the quote prior
to this never claimed to be perfectly happy and two) who are any of us to
judge who should or shouldn’t be in academia - you don’t know what they
are using it for, what their background is or anything to contribute to
saying whether anyone should be academia.

My understanding of SWC was that is was about improving things, and
teaching about process and concept with grounding in tools such as Git,
etc, but lately it appears in some cases that the Git part is becoming
more important that the version control - there are many version control
systems with advantages and disadvantages - just getting someone to
realise the usefulness of any of these is good and getting them to start
is even better. There appears to be an undercurrent of “fundamentalism”
forming which reads as do it my way as your way is just wrong.

I am reminded of what I teach students about software development:
If you the developer make business decisions about your client’s business,
then you are doing something wrong.
People have to make their own choices and change their own ways of
working, at these courses, we can show people what may be a new approach,
but if we denigrate their prior knowledge or call them idiots then we lose
any willingness to work with us and they will close down receptiveness.

Regards,
Alistair
-----------------------------------------------
Alistair Grant
EPCC
Rm 2403
0131-650-5028
-----------------------------------------------


Thought to be thought about:
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation,
because your character is what you really are,
while your reputation is merely what others think you are. (John Wooden)








On 05/05/2016 12:24, "Timothy Rice" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

>> It isn't productive if they think they're being patronised then go
>> on the defensive, get irritated or switch off altogether. As an
>> example, an attendee at a SWC workshop in September 2014 commented:
>>
>> >I never had any formal instruction in Excel, and instead have
>> >clawed my way into a decent working knowledge of it over the last
>> >almost two decades.  I am very proud of what I can do with it, and
>> >I have found it of great use, but I know there is a ton I don't
>> >know, so I was looking forward to that session. However, that
>> >session ended up being bitterly offensive. The basic message being
>> >conveyed was "you are an idiot for using Excel to do anything
>> >expect to put data into R, and an even worse idiot if you do
>> >things to make data comprehensible to a human."  There were snide
>> >cartoons, there was condescension...  It was infuriating. ...
>> >By the end I was livid, tired, and very stressed.
>
>
>
>More awareness around the shortcomings of Excel can be advocated as a way
>to attract people into R courses, but if they only find out about it after
>they sign up then you've falsely advertised what you're teaching.
>
>You can't force someone to take training wheels off, it just terrifies and
>confuses them. You can only show them videos of people doing stunts
>without
>training wheels, and help them find their balance and pick them up and
>give
>them a hug when they fall -- after they agree to take off their own
>training wheels.
>
>~ Tim
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.softwar
>e-carpentry.org<http://e-carpentry.org/>

--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org



--
Bert Overduin, PhD
TRAINING AND OUTREACH BIOINFORMATICIAN
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-8838<http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-8838>

EDINBURGH GENOMICS
The University of Edinburgh
Ashworth Laboratories
The King's Buildings
Charlotte Auerbach Road
Edinburgh EH9 3FL
Scotland, United Kingdom

tel. +44(0)1316507403
http://genomics.ed.ac.uk<http://genomics.ed.ac.uk/>
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org


The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to