Just my 2c: Any discussion about the code of conduct (and even about changing it), in my view, is welcome. But that discussion would itself have to follow the CoC as it is. I think it's rather backward to put the CoC in question *after* its violation.
It's deeply upsetting for me to see the CoC, which I have upheld and respected throughout my involvement with Software Carpentry, being called "a theoretical piece of shit". I interpret that as more than just "conversational use", and at the very least "inappropriate for professional audiences", if not outright insulting to contributors to the code, and to the community as a whole. Thanks, Ashwin On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Matthew Brett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Spaced Girl > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey. Wondering if they shut down the list at the moment or just your > email. > > Checked online and feel like it usually would have occurred by now. Also > > wondering just how often that fascist shit happens. > > Not sure - well - I guess we will see. People do get very upset on > emails, I have done it myself. I'm not sure I'm used to it, even > after many many years of trying to get better at not getting upset. > > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
