Hi,
I was speaking with a colleague last week about the possibility of using
GitHub to manage paper submissions and reviews. The journal in question
doesn't do open/accredited reviews, so I was wondering if anyone had any
experience with the following workflow:
- author submits paper by sending URL of public GitHub repo to journal
- journal creates private repo and merges author's submission into
- journal creates temporary accounts with auto-generated names for
reviewers and gives them access to the newly-created private repo
- reviewers post comments: authors and editors can see them/respond to
them, but identities of reviewers are known only to editors
- authors make changes in the private repo in response to reviewers'
comments, and merge from that to their public repo when they want to
Thanks,
Greg
--
Dr Greg Wilson
Director of Instructor Training
Software Carpentry Foundation
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
