Thanks all! Citations are important, and at different levels. The 2015 paper for Data Carpentry provides the best general overview of Data Carpentry. Some of the numbers are out of date, but the description of the goals and framework for workshops is still the same.
Something to cite for both Software and Data Carpentry could be the "Analysis of the Carpentries Long-Term Feedback Survey <https://zenodo.org/record/1039944#.WjqkdhTgKct>" by Kari Jordan et al. It has a DOI so is citable, and it provides an overview of the organizations and the long term impact of the workshops. Data Carpentry also has a Zotero page with a list of their papers, presentations and proposals. Data Carpentry references <https://www.zotero.org/groups/597593/datacarpentry/items?> It's also listed at the bottom of the 'About' page. http://www.datacarpentry.org/about/ Also, as Jaime mentions, the individual lessons all have DOIs too, and those citations are listed in the repos. https://zenodo.org/communities/datacarpentry/?page=1&size=20 https://zenodo.org/communities/swcarpentry/?page=1&size=20 We should have a better place for listing all of this! We'll plan to better update the About page too. Best, -Tracy On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Jaime Ashander <[email protected]> wrote: > Greg's and other answers seem to fit Shoaib's request. But if rather than > citing the organization and its goals or progress, someone is looking to > cite specific lessons, many have dois: > > https://zenodo.org/communities/datacarpentry/?page=1&size=20 > https://zenodo.org/communities/swcarpentry/?page=1&size=20 > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Greg Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I agree with Shoaib that the "Lessons Learned" paper doesn't describe >> goals and progress - it was meant primarily for internal consumption. I >> think Teal et al [1] and Williams & Teal [2] do a better job of laying out >> the big picture, though they're focused on Data Carpentry, and again are >> now a couple of years out of date. If anyone would like to do a paper on >> the Carpentries to complement the ones we've now done on best practices >> [3], good enough practices [4], and collaborative lesson development [5], I >> think that would be a wonderful contribution. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Greg >> >> [1] http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/10.1.135 >> >> [2] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.13207/full >> >> [3] http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/jour >> nal.pbio.1001745 >> >> [4] http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/jou >> rnal.pcbi.1005510 >> >> [5] https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.02662 (slowly inching toward publication) >> >> >> >> On 2017-12-19 5:47 AM, JACKSON Michael wrote: >> >>> Hi Shoaib, >>> >>> For SWC's FAQ, https://software-carpentry.org/faq/#citation: >>> >>> To reference Software Carpentry in publications, please cite: >>> >>> Greg Wilson: "Software Carpentry: Lessons Learned". F1000Research, >>> 2016, 3:62 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.3-62.v2). >>> >>> @online{wilson-software-carpentry-2016, >>> author = {Greg Wilson}, >>> title = {Software Carpentry: Lessons Learned}, >>> version = {2}, >>> date = {2016-01-28}, >>> url = {http://f1000research.com/articles/3-62/v2}, >>> doi = {10.12688/f1000research.3-62.v2} >>> } >>> >>> cheers, >>> mike >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Discuss <[email protected]> on behalf >>> of Shoaib Ahmed Sufi <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 19 December 2017 10:40 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Citing Software Carpentry and Data Carpentry >>> >>> Hmm - it would not make sense in the context I am using it in to refer >>> to lessons learned. >>> >>> I was looking for something describing what Software/Data Carpentry is >>> (e.g. goals, activities, progress) - that would make more sense - otherwise >>> I guess I could just cite the About page for each initiative. >>> >>> A wider question is how is Software & Data Carpentry tracking being >>> referred to? >>> >>> Would be nice to have a ‘Cite us’ page in one of the menu’s so it was >>> clear. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Shoaib >>> >>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 10:35, Raniere Silva <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> What’s the best way to cite Software Carpentry and Data Carpentry >>>>> >>>> Maybe not the correct one, but I would cite >>>> >>>> Wilson G. Software Carpentry: lessons learned [version 1; referees: 3 >>>> approved]. F1000Research 2014, 3:62 >>>> (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.3-62.v1) >>>> >>>> Raniere >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> >> -- >> If you cannot be brave – and it is often hard to be brave – be kind. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
