>So are you saying that vo covers the content just fine and braille  
>should just be a copy of the vo content? I'm not sure I like the idea  
>of making braille dependent on vo in that way; it means that anytime  
>vo would mess up, braille will mess up ttoo.
Yep, braille should be a separate process IMO. This way you can have
speech for things that work well with speech and braille for the other
things. This works really well on Linux.

Reply via email to