what part of "Not speaking about technology" didn't you understand?

I just ment as blind computer users.

if you remember the 80's and what we struggled with computers then, do we not have the same struggles now?

and no I'm "NOT" speaking of technology advances!
BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://blindtechs.net
Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accoiunts, shoutcast radio service, online games and more!
Powered by Unix not Microsoft


On Mar 17, 2006, at 7:52 AM, Travis Siegel wrote:

Oh come on, how can you possibly say we've gone nowhere. In 1986, I was using a 4.77MHZ XT machine with 256K quickly upgraded to 640K, dos 3.3 (I think) and a 20MB hd, 1 5.25 floppy drive, and an 84-key keyboard. I could actually use 90% of the programs on the machine, though some of them required a few gymnastics to make them work. Now, I've got a storage shed full of computers ranging from XT up to Pentium 2 machines. 2 laptops on my desk (one with an hd that needs an os reinstalled, and 1 with win2K on it) A desktop machine running win98, a tower running linux, a mac mini maxed out with 10.4.6 on it, 1GB of ram, 80GB hd, 250GB external hd, and let's see, about 75% of the programs are usable out of the box, and roughly 80-85% can be made to work with some gymnastics. So, you say nothing's changed. I beg to differ. I can do just as much as I did before (actually more, because the computer does it faster now) Plus now I have the ability to make my computer do absolutely nothing millions of times faster than it ever would have been possible 20 years ago. Not to mention, I could copy my 20MB hd onto this 80GB hd 4 thousand times, and I can even waste more space due to cluster size on my hd than my original one even had to start with. Not to mention all the wonderfully complex graphical resolutions that exist now. 320X200 could fit on my 1024X768 screen a few times with room to spare, and I can do all of this without the aid of any additional hardware, just what ships with my little miniMac. Try doing that in 1986.



Reply via email to