Access Curmudgeon wrote:
"My experience is that a wiki requires considerably more
discipline from the principle contributors. How will that be handled?"
The ones that seem to work best either have:
1. A lot on contributers (and traffic), and a core group of people to
monitor/edit updates.
2. A core group of contributers, and not too much interference from
'passing' editors.
Either way you need a core group of people who have a shared
understanding of what the site is trying to achieve.
As a relative outsider to this, what I would suggest is that it has two
main sections:
Introduction:
Learning from scratch, JAWs switchers guide, further reading and resources.
Applications:
How to use individual applications, each application having a page (or
set of pages).
How does that sound?
-Alastair
