James, perhaps you don't need it, but others might want it and may
need it. Sure there are plenty of other programs, but hey if Apple
does for example come out with an accessible Ipod or hell if someone
just wants an Ipod, well they can't use it at this point without
running Rockbox etc. because there's no other way I am aware of to
put stuff on to the Ipod. Besides all that, there's no way Apple can
run around spouting accessibility if their apps aren't even all
accessible, now can they. It simply makes sense.
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:26 PM, James Austin wrote:
Hi folks,
I don't honestly think that ITunes support is that important. Okay
I'll admit i was more than a little surprised when Voice Over
didntt work with Apple's ITunes - one of its trademark products,
but well do we really need it - I've deleted it from my mac.
James
----- Original Message ----- From: "christos hux"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac
OS X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 1:18 AM
Subject: leopard news
in the mac news websites and a few podcasts on coverage of Steve
Jobs wwdc keynote they say nothing about the new accessability.
I was glad to see this news about a improved voice over i guess
this will be 2.0 version.
That is super cool though in having the ceo of a major company
like this demo such a small nich highly important feature like
this. Doubt others would be as berave or thoughtful hint ms.
It would also be great of Apple if they did another beta test
program for leopard accessaibility like they did for tiger voice
over version 1.
From what I heard and read about the leopard features that were
being reported on I was not very impresed and thining I might pass
on it,now I am excitied with the new updated accessaibility. I
hope itunes will be much more useable this time around and we
will able to access the itunes store with vo.
