Larry: I could understand your viewpoint due to your lack of understanding of the differents in technical and physical architectual in the difference between the single intel processor you have and the dual core that you tried. I apologize you feel that way but maybe a good read up on how dual core processors on wikipedia might help you out there and maybe your understand. Gabe Vega The BlindTechs Network Website: http://blindtechs.net Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (602) 476-2307 (562) 261-5277 (866) 714-4244 ----- Original Message ----- From: "LARRY WANGER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby the blind" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 8:12 PM Subject: Re: 24 inch iMac
> Gabe, the experience I had using the new iMac the other day at the store > proves my point and makes you look silly. When I was using the new iMac it > was far more responsive and worked much more smoothly than mine with just > 1GB. I used it for several minutes in a variety of programs and operations > and noted just huge and significant performance improvements over my 9 > months old iMac. The changes being double the ram and a dual core processor > with the Intel Dual Core 2 processor. > Visit my home page at http://www.disabilitynation.net and subscribe to The > DisabilityNation Podcast. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gabriel Vega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by > theblind" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 8:00 PM > Subject: Re: 24 inch iMac > > > > but we are consumers with different real world needs. and the need for 2gb > > of ram or anywhere above 1gb of ram is not a reality at this time. its > > that > > windows mind set that keep people ranting about this fact > > Gabe Vega > > The BlindTechs Network > > Website: http://blindtechs.net > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > (602) 476-2307 > > (562) 261-5277 > > (866) 714-4244 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "LARRY WANGER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby > > the > > blind" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 2:07 PM > > Subject: Re: 24 inch iMac > > > > > >> What is a "consumer" verses a musician verses myself who is a podcaster. > >> All of us are consumers! > >> Visit my home page at http://www.disabilitynation.net and subscribe to > >> The > >> DisabilityNation Podcast. > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Gabriel Vega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by > >> theblind" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 1:32 PM > >> Subject: Re: 24 inch iMac > >> > >> > >> > Kevin, as you just stated, you're a musician, a professional in in > >> > which > >> > your applications need ram. I said Consumer is my last message doesn't > >> > need > >> > 2gb of ram. not just yet. > >> > Gabe Vega > >> > The BlindTechs Network > >> > Website: http://blindtechs.net > >> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > (602) 476-2307 > >> > (562) 261-5277 > >> > (866) 714-4244 > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "Kevin Reeves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS > >> > Xby > >> > the > >> > blind" <[email protected]> > >> > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 1:28 PM > >> > Subject: Re: 24 inch iMac > >> > > >> > > >> >> As a musician, the more ram I have, the more plugins and virtual > >> > instruments > >> >> I can load at one time. If I had something like the new mac pro with > >> >> 16 > >> > gigs > >> >> of ram, then I can load tons of memory intensive softsynths at once. > > It's > >> >> not always about whether the os can handle the ram well, it's about > >> >> the > >> >> ap > >> >> itself. The more ram I can eventually throw at pro tools for plugins > > and > >> >> softsynths, the easier it will make my work flow. I've got 1 and a > > half > >> >> gigs of ram in my g4, and sometimes that is not even enough. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
