On 1/11/07, David Poehlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
can you explain why the idea is fanciful?
Yes, but only because you didn't top post. Greg writes: Now for the Accessibility Evangelist to be able to do his job he or she will need the support of the highest level of Apple management. That means Steve Jobs has to tell all the other parts of the company that they must abide by what the Accessibility Evangelist says and no product may be release but that the office of the Accessibility Evangelist has not had a look at it first to insure it is accessible to the various disabled groups. I agree this observation but it illustrates why the idea is a non-starter. I cannot image any single "first principle" that has this level of control over the Apple product line. Except maybe that Jobs himself must like it. That particular power of veto cannot be delegated. If there are factors that come close to this kind of authority, you be sure they are hard nosed business factors driven by economics, not philosophy.
