Let me try this again. I'm hoping someone will find Parallels
usefoul; I was told that most Windows operating systems will be
supported, and since I already have Windows 2000 Professional, I
don't wantt to have o by anoprofessional with all the Sapi voices
from Microsoft. Richie Gardenhire, Anchorage, Alaska.
On Mar 11, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Gordon Smith wrote:
Hi all. Firstly, I thought I'd let the list know that I have the
contact details for one of the developers of Parallels Desktop. I
have just sent him a very detailed and lengthy description of the
problems which WE VoiceOver users face when trying to use
Parallels. I'm hoping that he will pass on my request for some
sort of accessibility for the main Parallels dialogues. One can
only ask, offer to work with these people and hope that they are
receptive. Demanding, petitions etc., just get people's backs up I
find. Anyway, to the more immediate problem. I am preparing a
little instruction guide for the installation of a guest operating
system under Parallels. If anybody would like a copy, feel free to
contact me privately. I'm going to try this out again myself later
on this evening, I want to see what performance is like in
comparison to Fusion. Whilst Fusion is fully accessible, there are
things missing that I'd like to have seen. For instance the
ability to tweak and customize the virtual machines once the
operating system is installed. Sure, you can do things such as
adjust the amount of memory used. But that's about it. Also the
networking and graphics and sound support under Parallels seems to
be superior to Fusion from what I've seen. So no harm in trying.
________________________________________________________________
Did you know! This message could have been secured by the TFT BBS
Digital Security Initiative. To secure
future messages from this sender, please click this link:
https://keys.tft-bbs.co.uk:10040/b/b.e?r=discuss%
40macvisionaries.com&n=K2aNG1%2BuXSvFSdxU0eXw3w%3D%3D
