Yeah I think so too. What I want is a Mac and I want it to run Windows and
do it fast. What I figure is that why not have them all. I will try all
three and determine from the best fit. What I don't want is the lack of
knowledge to be mistaken for inaccessibility.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh de Lioncourt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro
For the record, I think the performance situation is something that every
user must determine for themself. For the type of work I do, I need the
best performance that I can get, because I'm pushing the computer pretty
hard. Parallels was the best option at the time, and so that is what I
went with. I'd have gone with Fusion instead had it performed better.
It isn't about bugs or what-have-you in the beta versions. At some point
I hope to try Fusion again to see if it runs comparably with Parallels
now, but I suspect that Parallels probably does have a little bit of an
edge still.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Ryan Mann wrote:
Parallels may have a little bit better performance, but I use Fusion and
I think it's pretty decent. As a matter of principal, I don't pay for
programs that require sighted assistance if I can avoid it.
Original message:
I'm currently running Vista Business in Parallels on my MacBook. For
my Windows screen reader I us Window-Eyes, which seems to have far
fewer problems with the virtual environment than Jaws does.
Parallels will require sighted assistence for the initial set up, but
once you have it working you will be able to use the menus for all
tasks you may need to perform on a daily basis. Fusion is more
accessible with VoiceOver, but suffers from some performance issues
in my experience as well as those of many reviewers. I recommend a
free Windows program called SharpKeys from www.RandyRants.com. This
program will allow you to remap some of the keys on the keyboard to
make using your Windows installation and your Windows screen reader
easier in the virtual environment. The only change I've made on my
MacBook is to replace the accent key with an insert key, but that is
purely a matter of preference as there is an insert key already
available. It just makes hitting some of the commands easier.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On Aug 14, 2007, at 10:54 AM, VaShaun Jones wrote:
When I say work I am speaking of a solid solution that will enable
the best results for running Vista in a Fusion, Boot Camp or
Parallels environment.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac
OS X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro
VaShaun Jones wrote:
I want a Mac Book Pro with Parallels, Fusion or Boot Camp. I am
coming
from Windows XP and JAWS, so you can see my difficulty. Before I
spend over $3000 or more on hardware and software I want to make
sure
it will work.
Work for what exactly? If you mean, can a MacBook Pro run
Parallels, Fusion, or Boot Camp, then yes it can run all three.
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
--
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
