it would be interesting to see a thorough discussion of vo in leopard.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "will lomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by 
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: price of Leopard


hi i suggest those who want to get leopard and maybe upgrade the OS
rather than do a clean install, possibly buy this new e book i may
get it to be honest
and the customizing leopard. i want to see the new voice over
improvements, i bet the apple page doesn't list them all or do them
justice, should i say

On 24 Oct 2007, at 14:00, David Poehlman wrote:

> you can use it as an upgrade at least that is what I have gleaned
> from previous discussion.  there is even a take control book called
> take control of upgrading to leopard.
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:30 AM, James Austin wrote:
>
> It is an upgrade from Tiger?
> On 24 Oct 2007, at 13:14, David Poehlman wrote:
>
>> Yes, if you purchased your pc no earlier than oct 1, you get
>> leopard for $10.00 I think.  There are other ways to get a
>> discount as well, but it is a full os.  It is an upgrade if you
>> have tiger I don't think you can upgrade anything earlier than
>> tiger though.  The ouch here is that if you don't have tiger, you
>> better get it before friday or chances are, you won't get it.
>> Once you have upgraded to tiger, you can upgrade to Leopard.
>> Check with apple and others for a discounted price, but be
>> prepared to pay a whooping 129.00 if you don't fit into any of the
>> classifications or cannot find a discount.  I believe there is one
>> that anyone can take advantage of or perhaps two.  The first one
>> is from MacMall/amazon a little less there.  By a new Mac for a
>> couple grand and pay 10 dollars.  Hurry though or wait and you can
>> get leopard free.
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Rafael Bejarano wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone know if Apple will offer a discount for upgrading from
>> Tiger to Leopard?
>>
>> Rafael Bejarano
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>




Reply via email to