hi they talking a lod of crap as if they that committed why isn't
office ofr ma cusable then?
On 18 Jan 2008, at 15:08, Marshall F. Scott wrote:
Hi James,
I just thought the timing was ironic. I'm not in a position to give
a technical opinion.
Marshall
On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:03 PM, James Austin wrote:
Thanks for the article. Very interesting. I just have one question.
Microsoft seem to be saying that their new U.I Automation will
allow Screen Readers and the like interact with controls that are
not yet available, which is certainly an interesting prospect for
those using Windows. But surely as Blind/Visually Impaired users,
we should be able to integrate as fully as possible with our
sighted colleagues and friends? From what the article said, the
U>I>A does not represent the screen as I am told VO does; and
whilst this may be a good thing I don't know, it sounds like it is
a step backwards in terms of assimilation into the wider world for
us Blind users. Or am i talking rubbish?
Any thoughts?
Take care
James
On 17 Jan 2008, at 20:06, Marshall F. Scott wrote:
Folks,
I just noticed this article and found the timing ironic.
Microsoft seems to want accessibility on it's own terms.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080117/aqth030.html?.v=35
Marshall
Marshall F. scott
University of Utah - CVRTI
95 South 2000 East
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Phone: (801) 587-9523
Fax: (801) 581-3128
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: scott9576a
Marshall F. scott
University of Utah - CVRTI
95 South 2000 East
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Phone: (801) 587-9523
Fax: (801) 581-3128
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: scott9576a
