I'm pretty sure you can set fusion to use both cores, its one of the
advantages it had over Paralels as far as I remember. Cara has got a point
though about bootcamp being the way to go if you need your system to have
the maximum amount of oomph (technical term).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cara Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels
Actually one good reason to use BC is that with Fusion you are only
using one core of your processor to run each OS and with BC you're
using both cores with one OS.
Smiles,
CQ :)
On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Tim Grady wrote:
Works well here, and if for some reason I want to get rid of Windows on
my machine I just through it in the trash, no fooling around with disk
partitions.
On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:39 AM, David Poehlman wrote:
You are still open to nasties if you run a vm because you are running
windows no matter what. Most of the problems I've seen with windows on
macs
are a result of vm.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Søren Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X
by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels
Why is Boodcamp best? Sorry, I don't agree.
1: If you use Fusion, you are stil working inside the Mac operating
system. that means you have better security. If you use Bootcamp, you
only have the security features in Windows, and you have opened for
viruses and other things. I haven't tried Bootcamp, so I'm not sure
about that. I read it in a forum.
2: You don't need sighted assistance in fusion to install Windows. The
program does it automaticly.
---
View my Online Portfolio at:
http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn
