unlessyou have a less powerful one and then it is well worth the info. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Grady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:28 PM Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels
As powerfull and fast as processors are now-a-days that's hardly worth mentioning. On Feb 26, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Cara Quinn wrote: > Actually one good reason to use BC is that with Fusion you are only > using one core of your processor to run each OS and with BC you're > using both cores with one OS. > > Smiles, > > CQ :) > > > On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Tim Grady wrote: > >> Works well here, and if for some reason I want to get rid of >> Windows on my machine I just through it in the trash, no fooling >> around with disk partitions. >> On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:39 AM, David Poehlman wrote: >> >>> You are still open to nasties if you run a vm because you are >>> running >>> windows no matter what. Most of the problems I've seen with >>> windows on macs >>> are a result of vm. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Søren Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac >>> OS X by >>> theblind" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:28 AM >>> Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels >>> >>> >>> Why is Boodcamp best? Sorry, I don't agree. >>> 1: If you use Fusion, you are stil working inside the Mac operating >>> system. that means you have better security. If you use Bootcamp, >>> you >>> only have the security features in Windows, and you have opened for >>> viruses and other things. I haven't tried Bootcamp, so I'm not sure >>> about that. I read it in a forum. >>> 2: You don't need sighted assistance in fusion to install Windows. >>> The >>> program does it automaticly. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > --- > View my Online Portfolio at: > http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn > >
