I think we agree but are talking at cross purposes. For instance, I have several systems. the lowest end intels I have are 2.0 systems. I tried putting fusion on one of them and it ran my system down. I would say that I'll have this system for several years and if someone bought the same system when I did and that is the only system they have, they'll be in that boat for a while. Just because more power is here or on the way does not change the fact that must be made clear.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Grady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels That's like saying unless you have a car you can't drive 55 miles an hour. Of course, it's rather obvious that if you don't have a powerful enough machine then you might want to know that, but I think you can safely assume that machines are getting more and more powerful, and there aren't flocks of people buying older machines. On Feb 27, 2008, at 9:10 AM, David Poehlman wrote: > unlessyou have a less powerful one and then it is well worth the info. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Grady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS > X by > theblind" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:28 PM > Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels > > > As powerfull and fast as processors are now-a-days that's hardly worth > mentioning. > On Feb 26, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Cara Quinn wrote: > >> Actually one good reason to use BC is that with Fusion you are only >> using one core of your processor to run each OS and with BC you're >> using both cores with one OS. >> >> Smiles, >> >> CQ :) >> >> >> On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Tim Grady wrote: >> >>> Works well here, and if for some reason I want to get rid of >>> Windows on my machine I just through it in the trash, no fooling >>> around with disk partitions. >>> On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:39 AM, David Poehlman wrote: >>> >>>> You are still open to nasties if you run a vm because you are >>>> running >>>> windows no matter what. Most of the problems I've seen with >>>> windows on macs >>>> are a result of vm. >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Søren Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac >>>> OS X by >>>> theblind" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:28 AM >>>> Subject: Re: Boot camp vs Fusion vs Parrallels >>>> >>>> >>>> Why is Boodcamp best? Sorry, I don't agree. >>>> 1: If you use Fusion, you are stil working inside the Mac operating >>>> system. that means you have better security. If you use Bootcamp, >>>> you >>>> only have the security features in Windows, and you have opened for >>>> viruses and other things. I haven't tried Bootcamp, so I'm not sure >>>> about that. I read it in a forum. >>>> 2: You don't need sighted assistance in fusion to install Windows. >>>> The >>>> program does it automaticly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> --- >> View my Online Portfolio at: >> http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn >> >> > > > > >
