Scott,

He's new.  I rarely use it either but it has some interesting programmable 
possibilities if you like the sort of interface JAWS provides.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by 
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: A very disturbing rumor about the newer Macbooks


Because you have the option of using the numpad commander or not. Come
on guys, it's really not the end of the world. If you need the keypad
that bad, you can always purchase one. Surely it's easier to use an
external keypad in any event. Gee, I must be so old-school, I rarely
have used the numpad commander. grin Maybe I'm missing something and
need to try it out.

On Apr 9, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Jerry Matheny wrote:

> Oh and what's the point in Apple putting in numpad commander if you
> can't use the numpad? I mean, it's pointless.
>
>
> Best reguards,
>
> Jerry
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Poehlman" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS
> Xby theblind" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: A very disturbing rumor about the newer Macbooks
>
>
>> the fn key is still there.  what is gone is the embedded num pad.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Matheny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac
>> OS Xby
>> theblind" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:27 PM
>> Subject: A very disturbing rumor about the newer Macbooks
>>
>>
>> I just heard a rumor that in the newer macbooks that were released
>> this
>> year, Apple took out the function key modifier? Somehow I can't
>> believe
>> this. Can someone please tell me whether or not this is true? I
>> seriously
>> hope it's not.
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>
>
>

Scott Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







Reply via email to