After several web searches I concede to your views and as I stated in
another post the word processing text editing game has changed and my
mind set needs to adjust to that. It's almost like blogging taking
over the real journalism and the journalist going back and forth that
the old media is some how still better. Thanks for helping me to
broaden my understanding. Maybe you are old enough to remember that at
one time there was a difference though.
On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:
Shaun,
That's the whole point. TextEdit has pretty extensive formatting
options. YOu can create tables, lists, etc. It has spell checking
and grammar checking. It isn't severely limited at all, except for
very advanced features like footnotes and such. It is, I repeat, a
simple word processor.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On 25 Apr, 2008, at 1:20 PM, vashaun jones wrote:
Two sides to a story, but the one you gave indicated that Text Edit
is a Word Processor and it isn't. In the old days when you needed
to write down something you would use a note pad and when you would
write a book you would use a type writer. Quick note taking with
limited or no formatting or word processing for more functionality.
