I've read it, it was from late 2005, I'd like to know how much time that
reviewer spent actually using the program before writing that review. It
wouldn't surprise me if the screen reader companies did have something to do
with that. Blind people complain when they have to pay for a screen reader
and how they can't afford the technology, then a company actually builds the
access in to their operating system, and blind people say that's a bad thing
and it doesn't work. Ridiculous.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Poehlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: comments on voice over
Oh Mike,
You should have been here last yer when they published their "full
review".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Arrigo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:50 PM
Subject: comments on voice over
Hi all. I'm not sure if anyone reads the access world magazine, produced
by
American foundation for the blind, but the newest issue has an article
that
mentions voice over. The article is about digital music players. In the
article, the writer mentions using the mac, and says that voice over does
not provide nearly the accessibility blind people are used to on windows
computers. I personally disagree, and I've only had my mac for about two
and
a half weeks. If anyone is interested, here is the link for the article.
http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pub.asp?DocID=aw090304
